|
|
|
Final
Project
Due Dates:
proposal -
Tuesday, April 4
bibliography - Thursday,
April 13
final project - Friday,
April 28, 5:00 pm
Your
final assignment is to produce a well-researched, thoughtful, critically
astute, technically sophisticated, and above all interesting analytical web project on the
text or texts of your choice. The
topic you select may involve only one of our authors, but ideally
your work will make connections between them.
You may choose to focus solely upon the novels we’ve read this
semester, but you may also choose to involve other Pynchon and Melville
texts, or other primary texts that seem pertinent.
Your project should make a focused,
insightful, well-elaborated, well-supported argument about the novels
you select. In addition to performing a close critical
analysis of your primary texts, your paper must make careful use of
the technologies we have worked with this semester, with an awareness
of the principles of good web design we have discussed. Be sure, in other words, that you’re making sufficient use of the
medium of presentation — but also be sure that your bells and whistles
are there in service of your ideas, and not the other way around.
Your project should also make some
attempt to engage with the critical writings on the novels you discuss. The approach you take to this secondary material is entirely up
to you — there is no minimum or maximum number of secondary texts
you must use — provided your use of these texts is significant. In other words, your secondary texts must illuminate something about
the novels you’re discussing that is absolutely pertinent to your
argument. Be sure, however,
that your project does not devolve into a compilation of the research
you’ve done; the center of this project is, as always, your own original
thought.
This assignment involves three requirements:
Proposal: On Tuesday,
April 4, you and your partner will hand in a 250-500 word (1-2
page, double-spaced) preliminary project outline, in which you discuss
both your projected argument and your technical approach. This is of course not to suggest that you will be tied to this argument
or design, or that it won’t be affected by the research you will do. But this proposal should let me know the basics
of what you’re interested in and, above all, why you’re interested
in it. This need not be a
polished piece of prose, but do give us as much information as you
can; our feedback on this proposal may be helpful in focusing your
investigation.
Annotated
bibliography/webography: On
Thursday, April 13, you and your partner
will post an annotated bibliography that presents the results of your
research into the texts and ideas you will explore in your final project. This research should be both traditional, library
and journal-oriented research and web research. Your annotated bibliography should list ten
to fifteen sources for material potentially helpful to your project. You need not have read everything you cite
in detail, but you must at least have skimmed it well enough to tell
us, in a brief note following the citation, what each item is about
and what you think it will contribute to your overall concept.
This work will become a “for further reading” page helpful
to viewers of your final project.
Please use correct MLA citation format.
Final
project: The thing itself. This project must, as always, use appropriate citation format and
must — MUST — be carefully proofread.
Projects whose meanings are obscured by a plethora of typographical
or spelling or technical errors will not be read, and will incur late
penalties until resubmitted.
Note: All
deadlines are firm. No extensions will be granted.
|
|